A nice article in the UK Daily Telegraph is just the latest media piece to look at the current lack of global warming and raise some long overdue questions regarding this multi-billion dollar myth. And myth it truly is.

Climate change - a term global warming devotees love to use as if they invented it - is a feature of this planet, indeed, all planets in our solar system. The climate continuously changes and has changed through geological time. To point to melting glaciers and say that is evidence of warming is correct - it is - but to then say that warming is down to CO2 is a step too far.

When I argue against 'global warming' I hear this stupidity all of the time - "but I can see it with my own eyes"... really? What you see is climate change and it is an ongoing phenomena - that proves nothing regarding what is actually driving climate change.

And therein lies the problem.

The global warming crowd use models - pretty much like those used to predict the weather on a daily basis - to predict how warm it is going to get as a result of CO2 in the atmosphere. But those models have been producing spurious results for years and according to some earlier models, it should be as hot as hell by now. imply go and buy some books from the late 1980's on climate change and you will see for yourself. The problem is that no one truly understands what factors influence the Earth's climate and by how much - so every model is just that - a model. And all are wrong.

Now we learn that temperatures are actually declining, glaciers growing again and more... the evidence you would think is running contrary to global warming. Not so they say, its simply something else masking the effect of CO2 and sooner or later we will be in deep doo doo. It's an argument you cannot win you see because it isn't based on science after all but big money and politics.

The fact is that all kinds of people question the current science but feel unable to speak out because of the political, financial and social pressure. It has become unacceptable to question and that is a serious problem because science works through questions.

Global warming theorists are, in reality, pushing the concept of a one world government - how else could you tackle a global phenomena than have a world government they argue? Second, it is about money. Take science. How do you scientists obtain money for research? They propose topics to various groups that fund it. Who is behind the money? If I am a scientist right now am I going to do research into proving global warming or disproving global warming? Well, if I want money, it'll be the former right. So money greases the skids and it becomes a reality. Do a search for the ex-chief meteorologist of the New Zealand Meteorological Office and see what he has to say. He waited until he retired to make those statements - I wonder why?

Look hard at the evidence for a link between global climate change and CO2. If you do you will find it is spurious at best. Nice charts showing glacial CO2 and temperatures over the last half million years are often used to convince you that it is so but check that science out and you will find it was incorrect. Further analysis shows that while the two curves look as if temperatures follow CO2 content in the atmosphere, it is actually the other way around. I.e. Higher temperatures result in more CO2 in the atmosphere. Any geologist knows this to be true from the geological record but these now proven to be incorrect charts are trotted out over and over again as if they were fact. This is just one example of how pressure groups and governments have hijacked the facts or the fiction as it turns out to be and made you believe!

Nazi Germany showed everyone that if you say something is so long enough and often enough, everyone believes it whether it's true or not.

Global warming and the CO2 connection is weak and it's a fallacy... it's time we all woke up and realized we are being pushed towards a new global government and a new taxation regime by a powerful few. -